ISAPP consensus: Gut, yes. Immunity, no (for now)

Time to recognise ‘core benefits of certain probiotics’: ISAPP

ISAPP: “The panel concluded that the general benefit of support­ing a healthy digestive tract was reinforced by evidence gathered on a large number of different probiotic strains representing commonly studied species.”

The evidence has grown so strong for the best-documented probiotic strains that a generic digestive health claim should exist, according to a consensus statement from leading international researchers published this week in Nature Reviews: Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

With few regulatory systems around the world permitting probiotic-based claims – Canada, Switzerland, Italy and Japan being notable exceptions – researchers aligned to the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) met last October and concluded it was time to resolve confusion and concern around probiotic data and use of the term probiotic. Those conclusions have just now been published.

Core probiotic benefit – gut health

On the basis of the currently available literature, which includes well-designed clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the consensus panel concurred that certain effects can be ascribed to probiotics as a general class,” the researchers wrote, noting Health Canada had made a similar recognition for certain strains of the Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species for gut health.

“The panel concluded that the general benefit of support­ing a healthy digestive tract was reinforced by evidence gathered on a large number of different probiotic strains representing commonly studied species,” they continued.

“This conclu­sion was based on a body of available research, including high-quality meta-analyses, on a diversity of clinical end points (such as infectious diarrhoea, antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, gut transit, IBS, abdominal pain and bloat­ing, ulcerative colitis and necrotizing enterocolitis), as well as potential mechanistic actions suggesting that most strains of these species can be expected to have such ‘generic’ or ‘core’ effects on gut physiology and health.”

Immunity benefits differed, as while they were, “widely acknowledged”, they were also, “probably more strain-specific”.

Other less researched benefits including the health of the reproductive tract, oral cavity, lungs, skin and gut-brain axis were “promising”, but could not yet be, “shared across the whole class of probiotics.”

Probiotic naming rights: The ins and outs

The researchers said the current World Health Organization (WHO) definition of a probiotic as a, “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” was essentially fine and “relevant”.

In seeking to refine what foods and nutrients could claim to be probiotics, they ruled out:

  • Live microbes in fermented foods (too hard to define but could refer to themselves as ‘live and active cultures’)
  • Probiotic drugs
  • Faecal microbial transplants (too hard to define in most cases)

Dr Gregor Reid: One of the researchers calling for greater recognition of probiotic health benefits

However newer ‘commensal’ strains identified by metagenomic and microbiome research could call themselves probiotics, but this should, “proceed on a strain-by-strain basis”.

In focusing on the European Union, where the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has so far rejected more than 300 probiotic dossiers under the EU nutrition and health claims regulation (NHCR), the researchers highlighted vitamin C as an example of a nutrient that had won claims around fatigue and immunity with, “no robust RCTs in healthy individuals supporting these benefits…”

They added: “Substantial confusion exists in the regulation of probiotics, in many cases because regulators are attempting to apply schemes to probiotic foods and supplements that were initially designed to facilitate pharmaceutical development.”

“Clarifying the proper scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic is important so that all stakeholders in the probiotic field share an understanding of probiotics that is consistent with current research.”

The global probiotics market is worth more than €30bn according to market researchers.

Source:

Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Published online 10 June 2014 (doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66)

Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic’

Authors: Colin Hill, Francisco Guarner, Gregor Reid, Glenn R. Gibson, Daniel J. Merenstein, Bruno Pot, Lorenzo Morelli, Roberto Berni Canani, Harry J. Flint, Seppo Salminen, Philip C. Calder, Mary Ellen Sanders

Related News

Prebiotic fibers may improve metabolic factors in obese individuals: Study

Prebiotic fibers may improve metabolic factors in obese individuals: Study

"Explaining health claims in keeping with the science is not easy," says Bucchini, but is it time to rethink NHCR implementation?

The EU's health claim conundrum: The capsizing of consumer protection?

New Pediococcus acidilactici probiotic's origin in nature confers its high stability, supplier says

New Pediococcus acidilactici probiotic's origin in nature confers its high stability, supplier says

Mary Ellen Sanders: "The findings may be specific to B. animalis, not to all nHRB. But it’s an interesting first step.”

Japanese dairy backs bifidobacteria

Evidence of gut/brain connection piles up, but actual products are a ways off, researcher says

Evidence of gut/brain connection piles up, but actual products are a ways off, researcher says

Danone probiotic patent: 'This strain is able, inter alia, to improve the function of the enteric nervous system (ENS), in particular by increasing the vaso-active intestinal peptide (VIP) levels'

Danone files patent on probiotic to improve enteric nervous system

FDA warning over infant's death shouldn't call safety of probiotics into question, experts say

FDA warning over infant's death shouldn't call safety of probiotics into question, experts say

‘Community kitchens’ are delivering real benefits in African nations

African probiotic project reaching 10,000 infants a day

6 years of hurt: Probiotic heavyweights debate the EU’s health claim blockade

6 years of hurt: Probiotic heavyweights debate the EU’s health claim blockade

The probiotic sector wants its claims back...

ISAPP: Can we reclaim the word probiotics?

Psychobiotics can feed gut-brain health axis: 'It’s really an exciting frontier,' says professor

Psychobiotics can feed gut-brain health axis: 'It’s really an exciting frontier,' says professor

DuPont adds cholesterol-fighting probiotic in deal with Spanish company

DuPont adds cholesterol-fighting probiotic in deal with Spanish company

Bimuno marketing as it appears online today. Clasado is in the process of updating it to comply with the ruling

UK clams Clasado prebiotic claims; cans ‘transition period’ argument

DuPont hopes win on Swiss probiotic claim will help unlock EFSA process

DuPont hopes win on Swiss probiotic claim will help unlock EFSA process

“What we found is that most of the decline is down to the legislation," says Euromonitor.

Game of spoons: France’s 144,000 tonne, €420 million probiotic yoghurt health claim hit

Comments (1)

Rozalin Kostov - 15 Jun 2014 | 05:46

Time to recognise 'core benefits of certain probiotics':

And here comes the question-who was robbed of the opportunity of health benefits?- A/ Our ancestors fed up with various fermented foods,but with no scientifically based recognition for the benefits of the probiotics they regularly eat, or B/ The consumers of today fed up with data of scientifically based evidence for the core probiotics health benefits, but with doubtful habits to seek for and to eat regularly fermented foods.May be a future consensus statement will determine the losers.

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.