Goodbye GMOs (and vitamin B12, D, A, and Riboflavin): New non-GMO Grape Nuts and Original Cheerios are ‘certainly less nutritious’, claims professor

Original Cheerios used to have 25% of the daily value for Riboflavin (vitamin B2) in a 28g serving; the new version has 2%

The new non-GMO formulations of Original Cheerios and Grape Nuts might be made without ingredients from genetically engineered crops, but they also come with fewer vitamins - although brand owners General Mills and Post Foods won’t say why.

Post Foods’ new non-GMO Grape Nuts (click here) no longer include Vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin B12 or vitamin B2 (Riboflavin)*, while the new non-GMO Original Cheerios no longer have Riboflavin on the ingredients list (the old version has 25% of the daily value in a 28g serving while the new version has 2% of the DV).

Neither firm has responded to questions on why this is, or whether it has anything to do with the costs or challenges of going through the non-GMO Project verification process for the vitamins in question.

Dr Parrott: Cheerios went from being a major source of vitamin B2 to being almost zip

Dr Wayne Parrott, professor of crop science at the University of Georgia, said it was depressing to see that the new products are arguably less healthy given the lower vitamin content.

He told FoodNavigator-USA: “Cheerios went from being a major source of vitamin B2 to being almost zip."

This was particularly ironic given that a large percentage of people who say they are avoiding GMOs claim to do so for health reasons, he said.

“It is one thing for General Mills to say they took GM out [of Original Cheerios] due to customer preference.

"It is another to claim they are more wholesome because of it - something they are doing on the box itself and on their website - [he cites the fact that Original Cheerios’ non-GMO credentials are listed under the ‘Why they are so good’ heading on the website ‘], particularly when they took an important nutrient out of it almost completely. 

“The new version is certainly less nutritious.”

General Mills told FoodNavigator-USA:  "We don’t normally discuss product formulation.  But we will note we made no assertion non-GM ingredients were ‘more wholesome.’  That is simply mistaken."

Vitamin production methods

But why might vitamins be made from or with GMOs in the first place?

Some vitamins are produced from genetically engineered micro-organisms, or from micro-organisms grown in fermentation tanks using feed stock from sugar beet or corn, which could potentially be from GM crops.

While many manufacturers - especially in China - are likely not using GM corn as a feedstock, "information on what country the corn in grown in is not standard and this level of documentation rigor has not been typical in the past", Bethany Davis, R&D/Regulatory Project Lead at dietary supplement firm MegaFood, told FoodNavigator-USA.

"So unless the question is asked and country of origin is confirmed, vitamins will generally be considered high-risk," said Davis.

Vitamins that can be produced via fermentation include vitamin B12, B2 (Riboflavin), ascorbic acid (vitamin C), and beta-carotene, while some forms of vitamin E can also be produced from soy (which might be GM).

Sourcing non-GMO vitamins

So how easy is it to source non-GMO versions?  

They are certainly available, said Davis, who says the Non-GMO Dietary Supplement Working Group and Food Chain Global have helped the industry navigate this issue.  

But it's complicated.

For example, beta carotene (which the body converts into Vitamin A), can be manufactured from synthetic or natural sources such as the fungus Blakeslea trispora, said Davis. A fermentation process is usually involved and because beta carotene can degrade over time, it is usually micro-encapsulated with corn starch, modified food starch, or glucose syrup (which can be made from corn), or vitamin E elements (which can be made from soy).

Therefore, she said, "It has proven to be quite difficult to ensure that all of the starting materials and additives in micro encapsulated beta carotene are non-GMO."

The information required for Non-GMO Project Verification can be quite difficult to obtain

Meanwhile, if you want a third-party seal of approval for your non-GMO sourcing efforts, there are "completely different requirements which are not industry-standard at this time", added Davis, who has worked with the Non-GMO Project to get its seal on 42 of its products to date.

"The information required for Non-GMO Project Verification can be quite difficult to obtain as it generally requires information that manufacturers consider proprietary. Vitamin manufacturers hold their formulas close to their heart because it is all that separates them from their competitors."

The supply chain doesn't change overnight

She added: "[Leading vitamin supplier] DSM has had some success in providing adequate information to Non-GMO Project participants and Food Chain Global, the technical administrators for the Project, to allow their vitamins to be used in Non-GMO Project Verified products...

"In time we believe the type of information they require will become standardized; however at the moment, it’s a process - ingredient by ingredient."

Davis could not comment on Post Foods or General Mills, but noted that "for a large manufacturer that uses high volumes of a given nutritional ingredient like vitamins, the demand - and potential sales for the vitamin manufacturer - is high enough that they can likely find ingredient partners that are willing to produce vitamins to their specifications."

NPD Group: Shoppers won’t pay more for non-GMO

Her comments came as market researcher NPD Group said a consumer survey had shown that 67% of primary grocery shoppers are not willing to pay more for non-GMO foods, although more than half expressed “some level of concern” about GMOs.

There is, however, a subset of shoppers who are willing to pay more, which amounts to about 11% of all primary shoppers, claimed NPD Group.

Hartman Group: No single GMO story line has emerged for consumers

Trendwatcher Hartman Group, meanwhile, claimed that “if companies do not start speaking more openly about GMOs, they could lose their place in the conversation altogether”.

It added: “The power of social media, in particular, could quickly overwhelm any message that food companies want to convey once information or misinformation start taking hold."

Most who claim to avoid GMO say it is for health reasons

While it acknowledged that what consumers say - and what they do - can be quite different, the anti-GMO trend is “undeniable”, claimed Hartman Group, which polled 2,551 US adults last September about GMOs.

The percentage of consumers who deliberately avoid GMOs is 33% and growing quickly. Only 15% avoided GMOs in 2007."

Among people who claimed to be avoiding GMOs, 70% said it was because they were concerned about the impact on their health and well-being, while half said they want to know what goes into their food. Meanwhile, 36% were concerned about possible environmental impacts and 30% did not want to support companies that use GMOs.

*Post Foods will not say why the reformulated Grape Nuts contain four fewer vitamins, but sent us this statement: "The recipe was modified slightly, but still contains the signature crunch and 49g of whole grains... Grape-Nuts Original now has 45g of carbs per serving and no longer includes Vitamin A, Vitamin D, Riboflavin, and B12."

Related News

Boulder Brands CEO Steve Hughes: 'Consumers... think what we put in our food matters, and frankly, the same applies to what we leave out.'

Smart Balance becomes latest brand to go non-GMO, but says 'We aren’t taking a position on the GMO debate'

The GM debate is now so emotionally charged that GMOs are fast joining politics and religion as topics best avoided in polite conversation

Global ID: 'I wouldn't say the writing is on the wall for GM crops, but big brands are listening to the signals in the marketplace'

Axing GMOs from Cheerios has not boosted sales, says Gen Mills

Axing GMOs from Original Cheerios has not boosted sales, says General Mills

Gen Mills seeks to dismiss Cheerios Protein lawsuit

Gen Mills challenges Cheerios Protein lawsuit: Plaintiffs ‘completely misunderstand’ federal regs

FDA updates rules on vitamin D in plant-based dairy

FDA to update rules on vitamin D fortification of plant-based dairy alternatives

“The simple and unique nature of our product made it possible to label original Cheerios as not being made with genetically modified ingredients,” said General Mills in a statement on Photo from

Original Cheerios going GMO-free

Post unveils non-GMO verified Grape Nuts as Gen Mills says goodbye to GMOs in Original Cheerios

Post unveils non-GMO verified Grape Nuts as Gen Mills says goodbye to GMOs in Original Cheerios

Dr Parrott: General Mills is an example of a company wanting to have it both ways, and failing at both

Cheerio GMOs! But can General Mills have its non-GMO cake and eat it?

Euromonitor:  If non-GMO products perform better, brands will follow the money, whether they think GMOs are safe or not

Euromonitor: All eyes now on Kellogg as Gen Mills and Post Foods throw down Non-GMO gauntlet

Comments (11)

Myrna Jordan - 04 Mar 2014 | 04:55

Great Article

Ms Watson, check with Non GMO Project, I'm sure you are correct in your assessment of why the vitamins were removed. Supporters of a GMO free world have an array of reasons for supporting their argument. Personally for me it is a tie between the cost to the environment and the cost of the experiment on human health. There is 2 decades of data from Rodale's Farming Systems Trial proving better yields from Organic. Here is an article with most recent data on GMO effects to human health I applaud Post's decision, I hope consumer's support them.

04-Mar-2014 at 16:55 GMT

Mischa Popoff - 27 Feb 2014 | 05:40


I have a standing offer to debate such issues with anti-GMO organic activists. I grew up on an organic farm and worked for five years as an organic inspector. But I left the organic movement when I realized it was all just a bureaucratic scam designed to propel a political agenda. Sadly, the activists refuse to debate me. Please visit my website to see how you can help change this:

27-Feb-2014 at 17:40 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.